Logo

There Is No Iran Nuclear Deal and There May Never Be

President Trump's new agreement with the Islamic Republic falls short of the one he shredded

Share
There Is No Iran Nuclear Deal and There May Never Be
U.S. President Donald Trump attends the G7 summit in Evian, France, on June 17, 2026. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The agreement President Donald Trump has reached with Iran is not, strictly speaking, a nuclear deal. All the key elements of limiting Iran’s nuclear capabilities are to be negotiated over the next 60 days. But that period could be extended. It is possible that there will never be a completed agreement.

So it is difficult to say definitively how this new agreement compares to the highly detailed 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) negotiated by a team of experts at the direction of President Barack Obama.

We can, however, compare the Obama deal with some of the elements released Wednesday in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that was electronically signed on Sunday by Trump, Vice President JD Vance and the speaker of Iran’s parliament, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. It will be formally signed on Friday in Geneva.

The MOU basically commits the United States and Israel to end the war in the Persian Gulf and Lebanon that they began on Feb. 28. (Israel is referenced in the text as a U.S. ally but did not sign the agreement and may openly oppose it.)

The first five paragraphs of the MOU detail a ceasefire, an opening of the Strait of Hormuz, a pledge to keep the strait toll-free for 60 days and a nonaggression pact wherein Iran and the U.S. pledge to “undertake from now on not to initiate any war or any military operation against each other, and to refrain from the threat or use of force against each other, and ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon.” The U.S. will, within 30 days, withdraw all its forces “from the proximity” of Iran.

The most controversial part of the agreement is Paragraph 6, which establishes a $300 billion fund for the “reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran.” This is very close to the reparations fund that Iran demanded before it would end the fighting. It is unclear exactly who will contribute to this fund.

Paragraph 7 starts the flow of additional revenue to Iran. The U.S. pledges to immediately begin the process of terminating “all types of sanctions” against Iran. This is expanded in Paragraph 10, wherein the U.S. pledges to immediately “issue waivers for the export of Iranian crude oil.” This means all restrictions imposed upon Iran’s oil sales since the 1980s will be lifted.

Paragraph 11 opens up another tranche of revenue for Iran. The U.S. pledges to “make fully available for use the frozen or restricted funds and assets” of Iran. Tehran will determine how those funds are spent.

The only mention of nuclear issues is in Paragraph 8. It says Iran “reaffirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons.” This is a somewhat weaker pledge than in the JCPOA, which stated that the Islamic Republic “reaffirms that under no circumstances will Iran ever seek, develop or acquire any nuclear weapons.” It is similar to other pledges that Iran has made going back to 1957, during the time of the shah.

All other nuclear issues are to be resolved in later negotiations, including “the disposition of stockpiled enriched material.” It allows that one way of disposing of that material would be “down blending on site.” It does not mention actually shipping the uranium out of Iran.

Until these and all other issues are resolved, Iran and the U.S. agree to “maintain the status quo,” meaning Iran’s nuclear program remains intact and the U.S. does not apply any further sanctions or deploy any further forces in the region.

The JCPOA was a far more detailed agreement that took 18 months to negotiate. Its more than 150 pages provided for the dismantling of most of Iran’s nuclear capabilities, forced Iran to ship all but a token amount of its enriched uranium out of the country and destroy its plutonium-producing reactor, and froze development of its centrifuges and other technology for 10 to 25 years. It established the most intrusive inspection regime ever negotiated, allowing the U.S. and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to monitor every ounce of uranium in Iran from the time it was mined until it was stored as fuel. The MOU does not provide for any inspection regime. That is to be resolved later.

The JCPOA also allowed Iran access to some of its frozen assets, but not until Iran had completed the dismantling of most of its complex and shipped out 8 tons of enriched uranium. Trump’s MOU seems to pay Iran upfront, with nuclear issues resolved after payments. While the JCPOA allowed Iran access to some $50 billion in frozen funds, at least half of that was paid directly to Iran’s debtors. This MOU would allow Iran immediate access to $24 billion and potentially much more.

After Trump tore up the JCPOA in 2018, Iran slowly rebuilt its nuclear complex. It now has much more advanced centrifuges (prohibited for 10 years under the Obama deal) and a stockpile of 11 tons of enriched uranium, including about 1,000 pounds of uranium enriched to 60%, just shy of the 90% purity required for the core of a nuclear bomb. The JCPOA prohibited Iran from stockpiling more than 300 pounds of uranium, and that was limited to 3.67%, the purity required for fuel for its power reactor at Bushehr.

One troubling aspect of the MOU is that it refers to “Iran’s nuclear needs” in Paragraph 8. This may refer to Iran’s claim that it needs to continue enriching uranium to both the low levels required for its power reactor and the 20% level required to fuel its research reactor at the University of Tehran. It appears that any deal will, like the JCPOA, limit Iran’s nuclear complex, but not eliminate it.

The last paragraph of the MOU says that the final deal will be endorsed by the U.N. Security Council. That was also true of Obama’s deal.

Any further comparison of the two agreements would be like comparing a fully constructed house with the concept of a new building. There is not yet an actual agreement on Iran’s nuclear program and there may never be. As the negotiations begin, Iran’s leverage will only increase, while the United States’ will decline.

“Spotlight” is a newsletter about underreported cultural trends and news from around the world, emailed to subscribers twice a week. Sign up here.

Sign up to our newsletter

    Will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy